Rabbi Tells Hidden History Of Zionism and Islam that Will Leave You Spee...

 Almost with great certainty I can say the official story here can simply not be the case with what they are describing happened and I will tell you why.

They claim the vertical stabilizer of the plane getting the fuel got damaged landed safely with the refueling plane crashed, thats the official story, my question is, if the plane receiving the fuel ONLY got damages on its vertical stabilizer and no damage on the nose no other damages on the wing only on its vertical stabilizers, meaning the front of the receiving aircraft could have not collided with the refueling tanker otherwise we would have had other damages on the receiving plane, what caused the refueling tanker to suddenly crash ? because it couldnt have been the receiving plane caused it, (and) if the vertical stabilizer of the receiving plane would have hit the fuel tanker at the bow of the tanker, that wouldnt have been too worrying because its no critical area of a huge plane (and) if it would have been a major collision between the vertical stabilizer of the refueling tanker and the bow of the refueling tanker rest assured the whole vertical stabilizer of the receiving tanker would have been snapped off completely (and) it wouldnt been able to land, it would have lost control all together, so the story they are feeding physically cannot be true, its impossible, here is what I think happened, you see these planes when they are about to transfer over fuel to another jet they have to fly relatively low below turbulent air and relatively slow, I think a heat seeking missile no MANPAD but other variants with longer range which can fly higher than MANPADs was fired and hit the refueling tanker and debris hit the vertical stabilizer of the other plane and it made it to land, thats what happened, 95% thats what happened.